Stop the Endless Debate.
Discover what Actually Matters.
Get Started.
Create New Ranking →
Who it is for
Better Decisions. Faster. Clearer. Easier.
01
For Teams and Organisations
Structured and easier prioritisation for product, strategy, hiring and planning decisions.
02
For Individuals
Gain clarity quickly among different options on day-to-day choices and big life decisions.
03
For Groups
Decide together without the drama and endless discussions.
How it works
01
Add your options
Strategies, priorities, candidates — anything you need ranked. Works for 4 items or 40.
02
Everyone compares
Two options. One click. No anchoring, no groupthink. Each participant's voice counts equally.
03
A clear result emerges
Mathematically derived from every comparison made. In real time, as participants respond.
EXAMPLE: TEAM · SIMPLE RANKING
Which product features should we build next?
01
Mobile app
100%
02
User authentication
83%
03
Reporting dashboard
67%
04
API integration
50%
05
Onboarding flow
33%
EXAMPLE: PUBLIC SECTOR · MULTI-CRITERIA RANKING
Which transport schemes should we fund?
Top ranked
Cycling Network
Impact 85%
Feasibility 88%
Cost-Effectiveness 92%
Equity 72%
Political Acceptability 78%
108
83%
Rank Option Impact
20%
 Feasibility
20%
 Cost-Effectiveness
20%
 Equity
20%
 Political Acceptability
20%
 Points
(unweighted)
 Win Rate
(weighted)
01 Cycling Network
85%
22 Wins · 7 Losses
88%
23 Wins · 6 Losses
92%
24 Wins · 5 Losses
72%
19 Wins · 10 Losses
78%
20 Wins · 9 Losses
108
83%
02 Bus Rapid Transit
62%
18 Wins · 11 Losses
55%
16 Wins · 13 Losses
65%
18 Wins · 11 Losses
68%
18 Wins · 11 Losses
58%
16 Wins · 13 Losses
86
62%
03 Light Rail
48%
12 Wins · 17 Losses
35%
9 Wins · 20 Losses
30%
8 Wins · 21 Losses
58%
15 Wins · 14 Losses
45%
12 Wins · 17 Losses
56
43%
EXAMPLE: INDIVIDUAL · SIMPLE RANKING
What should I focus on this year?
01
Health
100%
02
Career
83%
03
Family
67%
04
Learning
50%
05
Finances
33%
EXAMPLE: ORGANISATION · SWOT ANALYSIS
What are the strategic factors in addressing climate change?

Strengths

Most significant strengths Win Rate
01
Growing public awareness
83%
23 Wins · 5 Losses
02
Rapid renewable technology improvement
75%
21 Wins · 7 Losses
03
Strong international frameworks
67%
19 Wins · 9 Losses

Weaknesses

Most critical weaknesses Win Rate
01
Fossil fuel dependency
90%
25 Wins · 3 Losses
02
Political short-termism
75%
21 Wins · 7 Losses
03
Inadequate infrastructure
62%
17 Wins · 11 Losses

Opportunities

Greatest opportunities Win Rate
01
Green economy job creation
88%
25 Wins · 3 Losses
02
Energy independence
79%
22 Wins · 6 Losses
03
Innovation investment
67%
19 Wins · 9 Losses

Threats

Most serious threats Win Rate
01
Tipping points and irreversible change
92%
26 Wins · 2 Losses
02
Geopolitical instability
75%
21 Wins · 7 Losses
03
Greenwashing
58%
16 Wins · 12 Losses
Try it now. It's easy and intuitive.
Create New Ranking →
— Simple by design —
Up and running in two minutes.
Add your items, share a code, watch results appear. No account required to try.
  • Individual or group
  • Live in the room or at your own pace
  • Clear and transparent ranking
— Nuanced When Required —
As sophisticated as your decision demands.
From companies to families and friends, get the level of scale and detail you need.
  • Multi-criteria weighting
  • Results by participant segments
  • Qualitative data and explanations
Why it works
Relative judgement between two things is more reliable than absolute judgement between many things. Every time.
That's just the way us humans are wired.
Eliminates anchoring bias
No numbered scales. Each comparison is independent — the result reflects genuine preference.
Removes the loudest voice
Every participant contributes equally. The result is what the group actually thinks.
Surfaces real consensus
The aggregated result reveals where genuine agreement exists — and where it doesn't.
Produces a defensible result
Mathematically derived from every comparison. No ambiguity about why A sits above B.
"The method of paired comparisons yields a scale of psychological values that is more reliable than any other method of scaling."
Louis Leon Thurstone · Psychological Review, 1927 · Still true.
Ready to decide?
Free to try · No account required · Up and running in two minutes
Create New Ranking →
Get in touch
Questions, feedback or feature suggestions?
We read everything. Questions about the method, a use case we haven't thought of, or just want to say hello — send a message.
Thanks — your message is on its way. We'll be in touch.